Free Sample Essays > African History
Waitangi Tribunal
were alternatives to the pipeline which were practical and did not go against Maori values. The Tribunal recommended that, the pipeline should not proceed, that research be carried out into land disposal as an alternative method for getting rid of the effluent, and that the Water and Soil Conservation Act 1967 and related legislation be changed so that regional water boards. In addition, the Planning Tribunal had to take account of Maori spiritual and cultural values when they made decisions about water rights.
The Crown subsequently abandoned all financial support for the pipeline and instead announced its support for a combined treatment plant and land-disposal option for Rotorua's effluent.
In conclusion, after the claim had been made and was considered by the Tribunal, an outcome was reached which satisfied all parties involved.



